Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumerian Records (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 20:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Sumerian Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Deleted once, re-created, has never had any sources or assertion of notability. Guy (Help!) 23:05, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep, it is linked from quite a few albums. Unless you delete all these albums from wikipedia. Xuz (talk) 23:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Now it has an assertion of notability, OK? Simple Internet searches can find sources for this. Can be rescued. Bearian (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. If the label issues recordings by at least nine notable bands, then that makes them notable in my opinion. Jim Heaphy (talk) 04:12, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Lean Keep. I can see why it was nominated, but there are some sources out there that reference it, and a number of these bands have individual articles as well. Anyone know why they have the Egyptian sphinx on their logo though?--Milowent (talk) 18:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.